A huge part of our heritage is turning to dust as we speak, this due to the the extension on Copyright terms. this dust is made of the once grate films of the past, made on nitrous-base. just turning to dust.
edit at the end.....
Copyright: the double edged sword.
I am listening to "Free Culture" a book by Lawrence Lessig and I get infuriated with how the media companies and the MPAA could not support the "The Eldred Act" but instead demand that it would hurt copyright holders.
there argument went something like this: "We con not let other peoples movies get in to the public domain, cus we will not have control over the public domain. It is better that the cultural heritage in these moveis turn to dust!" -- Jack Valenti of the MPAA
This is not relay what he said, but it was the essence of it.
Well I relay hove nothing to say about this, I encourage you to read the book, available here and here( Audio Book) and here.
So the double edged sword:
I am a copy right holder, when I make a note to my dad, that is copyrighted, when I write here, it is copyrighted, it is my work, I own it. But, is it rely necessary that you are not allowed to reprint this, in any way shape or form until 50 years after my death?
No, it is not.
If I were to make a book ( whish I hope that I will one day do) I will put on the first page: "In event of my death this work will become Public Domain" and/or "This work will become public domain after 25 years of its initial publication.
Why?
Cus, all the revenue that I will probably make will be a) during my life time b) with in 25 years of its first print.
How do I know this?
Easy: I have books in my shelf that is no longer in print, and I have no Idea how to contact the copyright holder if I wanted to make an digital version of it and make public so that this grate works would "stay alive" so to say. I have to wait till the copyright owner dies, then wait 50 years more.
He would not make a dime of its digital copy, granted, but he does not make a dime of it now. So I think that something like a shorter copyright term (say 25 years) would be ideal, and then have the right to extend it for a fee of something like 1€ to extend it an other 25 years and then again, but no more then 75 years.
But then we have software. I wonder what the FSF and the GNU project has to say about this? I mean is the project as a howl one work, or is every file its own work? if you do the sums you will soon see that it all adds up if you were to extend the licence term of some of the projects, so they do not pass in to the public domain. And if the were to become public domain the GPL would be nullified on old revisions. this making them fair game for leeches.
You can see where I am going with this.
When I write or draw stuff that I put up on the net, I always put it under CC-BY-SA (not including this blog ATM), this due to I want my work to not become orphaned in case of my death, but put in it archives, and be part of a time line of human history, my "thoughts echo on in future minds" so to say.
I relay thought that I had something to say here, but my knowledge in the subject is limited, so I will end this post here.
Edit:
Found this on the intratubez: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhTUzNKpfio it is a video by from TEDxNYED with Lawrence Lessig.
Even though I hate Conservatives and Libertarians, he makes a good point.
(I am the lefty lefty, free market loving, free culture promoting guy)...
2011-01-13
2011-01-05
The code
"I am mad!" -- someone
EDIT: Some one does not know what the One True Brace Style is... Let me help you google it.
My problems with the coding standard that are in use today.
I have so many problems with the coding standard for c-like languages in most project: first of the idea that starting brackets should be on a new like, this makes the code IMHO look like fuck:
Am I the only one that sees the problem with this? The fukking bracket is not on the same line as the class! it is an eye sole!
The brackets on a new like makes the code look messy, and hard to read. It looks like a coding error to me.
this is the way it is suppose to be done:
it is no longer an eye sore.
So how did the coding standard that is in use today come to be so popular?
The KnR style was invented by Kernighan and Ritchie's book The C Programming Language* and I can draw the conclusion that this book was read by many future programmers, and then these programmers started projects, and wrote books about programming which then inspired others.... A downward spiral of programming style.
And this downward spiral was accelerated by the the coding standard enforced by GNU** that encapsulated lodes of project that are a part used in our day to day lives.
I am a promoter of the One True Brace Style*** or its derivitive that is intended at making the more reader friendly. Even the Whitesmiths Style**** is better then the KnR Style, even though the end brace is at the wrong level.
help out and stop this downward spiral in to coding hell and convert your code from KnR to 1TBS or one of its derivative.
On White Spaces VS Tabs:
I do not give a fukk, I like tabs, but white spaces can be better if you are doing code with many indentation levels. b/c as you know a line of code has to be less then the 80 characters/columns ( this is just a standardised convention for interoperability and niceness of code)***** and with a tab taking up eight characters we have a when you hit the tenth level in your code.
And btw, gedit converts my tabs to what I want if I want.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#K.26R_style
** http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.txt
***http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Variant:_1TBS
**** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Whitesmiths_style
***** I have lines that are longer then 80 chars, but I try to minimise it as much as possible.
EDIT: Some one does not know what the One True Brace Style is... Let me help you google it.
My problems with the coding standard that are in use today.
I have so many problems with the coding standard for c-like languages in most project: first of the idea that starting brackets should be on a new like, this makes the code IMHO look like fuck:
class foo()
{
x=2+3;
print(x);
}
Am I the only one that sees the problem with this? The fukking bracket is not on the same line as the class! it is an eye sole!
The brackets on a new like makes the code look messy, and hard to read. It looks like a coding error to me.
this is the way it is suppose to be done:
class foo(){
x = 2 + 3;
print(x);
}
it is no longer an eye sore.
So how did the coding standard that is in use today come to be so popular?
The KnR style was invented by Kernighan and Ritchie's book The C Programming Language* and I can draw the conclusion that this book was read by many future programmers, and then these programmers started projects, and wrote books about programming which then inspired others.... A downward spiral of programming style.
And this downward spiral was accelerated by the the coding standard enforced by GNU** that encapsulated lodes of project that are a part used in our day to day lives.
I am a promoter of the One True Brace Style*** or its derivitive that is intended at making the more reader friendly. Even the Whitesmiths Style**** is better then the KnR Style, even though the end brace is at the wrong level.
help out and stop this downward spiral in to coding hell and convert your code from KnR to 1TBS or one of its derivative.
On White Spaces VS Tabs:
I do not give a fukk, I like tabs, but white spaces can be better if you are doing code with many indentation levels. b/c as you know a line of code has to be less then the 80 characters/columns ( this is just a standardised convention for interoperability and niceness of code)***** and with a tab taking up eight characters we have a when you hit the tenth level in your code.
And btw, gedit converts my tabs to what I want if I want.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#K.26R_style
** http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.txt
***http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Variant:_1TBS
**** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Whitesmiths_style
***** I have lines that are longer then 80 chars, but I try to minimise it as much as possible.
2011-01-02
Physics and Life
"Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, Teach a man how to make fire and he will be warm the rest of his life" -- someone
Education phails - Why do I need to know physics?
I have been looking in to higher education and find it has relay high requirements for prior education: I need no have done the A and B* coarse in Physics to be able to attend the courses I have been looking at (Programming and Computer Science -shy). Here is the problem: I do not have Physics B .... I have to go and "read up" those courses, But I do not want to do it over the intrawebs (done that, I phaild miserably) , or with a bunch of High School Students who are running around...
Why do I even need to know Physics to write code and thesis? It does not make any sense. I think that I would fit in to the "IT"-crowd at UNI quite well and be a "good" student. I already know some basic Python, C, PHP, (Java) and such. I see no reason why I need to know Physics when I am working on a computer science thesis or collaborating with my mates on a project.
Time to restructure the system!
I am a advocate of the "system of basic knowledge before entering a program"-procedure, but sometimes that hurts the system.
As an institution, the unis have to keep up a standard, but that standard is set by the students previous education, not the students real Knowledge. I can get "competence" in a subject by doing courses and doing good in class and on the tests, but that is not a test of real knowledge only temporary or surface learning, not real learning. An admission test would be a better test, a test that you had a week to do a test that consists of a number of points like: write a program to do X, what were your sources for this? Do a collaborative project with a/two test mate(s), How did you collaborate? what were the problems you encounter? write an essay on any subject you like. etcetera etcetera.
Or have a system where you can submit a personal paper, some code you have been working on, some of your prior essays and a letter of approval from some one. and that would weigh as much as any degree or mark. (provided you have a basic minimum degree).
What are your thoughts on this?
* http://translate.google.se/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsv.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFysik_B
Education phails - Why do I need to know physics?
I have been looking in to higher education and find it has relay high requirements for prior education: I need no have done the A and B* coarse in Physics to be able to attend the courses I have been looking at (Programming and Computer Science -shy). Here is the problem: I do not have Physics B .... I have to go and "read up" those courses, But I do not want to do it over the intrawebs (done that, I phaild miserably) , or with a bunch of High School Students who are running around...
Why do I even need to know Physics to write code and thesis? It does not make any sense. I think that I would fit in to the "IT"-crowd at UNI quite well and be a "good" student. I already know some basic Python, C, PHP, (Java) and such. I see no reason why I need to know Physics when I am working on a computer science thesis or collaborating with my mates on a project.
Time to restructure the system!
I am a advocate of the "system of basic knowledge before entering a program"-procedure, but sometimes that hurts the system.
As an institution, the unis have to keep up a standard, but that standard is set by the students previous education, not the students real Knowledge. I can get "competence" in a subject by doing courses and doing good in class and on the tests, but that is not a test of real knowledge only temporary or surface learning, not real learning. An admission test would be a better test, a test that you had a week to do a test that consists of a number of points like: write a program to do X, what were your sources for this? Do a collaborative project with a/two test mate(s), How did you collaborate? what were the problems you encounter? write an essay on any subject you like. etcetera etcetera.
Or have a system where you can submit a personal paper, some code you have been working on, some of your prior essays and a letter of approval from some one. and that would weigh as much as any degree or mark. (provided you have a basic minimum degree).
What are your thoughts on this?
* http://translate.google.se/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsv.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFysik_B
2010-12-31
Computers
"a computers do not do what you want it to do, but what you tell it to do" -- Someone
The language does not matter...
but the libraries does. this does not seem so controversial, until you look at what the trolls and dogs say about the languages:
"[java/python/c/c++/C#] sucks b/c [x,y,z] and thereby [java/python/c/c++/C#] is better then [java/python/c/c++/C#]"
We have all seen it an Identi.ca, status.net, twiittard and 4chan. this was my possision on java, I hated java, and loved C and C#, then I saw Minecraft.... It changed my point of view, it is realy not the language that is the problem, but programmers, some languages fit some programers better then others, dynamic languages like Python is fun to program with, and Java is better at being cross-platform then C.
The fact that Minecraft is as fast at it is is remarkable, considering it has to calculate what blocs to show and at the same time generate thousands of blocks in seconds. The logic is just remarkable and shows the that is is not the language that is the problem, but the programmer. Java has not sucked in several years, it now has JIT which is/was one of the selling points of C#/Mono (Monos jit is faster then the Microsoft jit implementation*).
Now even C can be compiled into code that is run in a jit (LLMV and CLang). and the once slow language Python has its own jit**, which is fast as fuck***.
Toolkits does not matter...
I am a GTK fan boy, and I hate Qt.... well maybe not, some of my favourite apps are written in Qt: mumble-client and bzr explorer. but there do not integrate well in to the desktop environment that I use (Gnome). but truly the problem here is not that Qt is bad but that GTK looks better on my desktop.
The DVCS/DRCS does not matter....
.... as long as I can use bzr to get your git.
I do follow some projects that are using git on bzr, but some projects are just retarded and are dependent on some aspect of using git to even compile****, whish is a relay bad decision making imho. when writing code and using DVCSs, do not make it unmigrational, or that it can not be pulled in other ways then via your DVCS, be it curl, git-bzr or bzr-git*****.
I must say that the backend should not matter here, only that you can make patches and run the code without using tools you do not want to use.
I like bzr b/c its integration into Nautilus and hate git b/c of its way of naming revisions and file handling. That is why I want to get your git with my bzr pull.
* http://geekswithblogs.net/ciscbrain/articles/Mono_vs_dotNet_Performance_Test.aspx
** http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
*** http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/performance-comparison-c-java-python-ruby-jython-jruby-groovy/
**** http://dev.xonotic.org/projects/xonotic/wiki/Repository_Access (the ./all script uses git to pull the sub directories and has to use git to even compile)
***** http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/foreign/bzr-on-git-projects.html and https://github.com/pieter/git-bzr
The language does not matter...
but the libraries does. this does not seem so controversial, until you look at what the trolls and dogs say about the languages:
"[java/python/c/c++/C#] sucks b/c [x,y,z] and thereby [java/python/c/c++/C#] is better then [java/python/c/c++/C#]"
We have all seen it an Identi.ca, status.net, twiittard and 4chan. this was my possision on java, I hated java, and loved C and C#, then I saw Minecraft.... It changed my point of view, it is realy not the language that is the problem, but programmers, some languages fit some programers better then others, dynamic languages like Python is fun to program with, and Java is better at being cross-platform then C.
The fact that Minecraft is as fast at it is is remarkable, considering it has to calculate what blocs to show and at the same time generate thousands of blocks in seconds. The logic is just remarkable and shows the that is is not the language that is the problem, but the programmer. Java has not sucked in several years, it now has JIT which is/was one of the selling points of C#/Mono (Monos jit is faster then the Microsoft jit implementation*).
Now even C can be compiled into code that is run in a jit (LLMV and CLang). and the once slow language Python has its own jit**, which is fast as fuck***.
Toolkits does not matter...
I am a GTK fan boy, and I hate Qt.... well maybe not, some of my favourite apps are written in Qt: mumble-client and bzr explorer. but there do not integrate well in to the desktop environment that I use (Gnome). but truly the problem here is not that Qt is bad but that GTK looks better on my desktop.
The DVCS/DRCS does not matter....
.... as long as I can use bzr to get your git.
I do follow some projects that are using git on bzr, but some projects are just retarded and are dependent on some aspect of using git to even compile****, whish is a relay bad decision making imho. when writing code and using DVCSs, do not make it unmigrational, or that it can not be pulled in other ways then via your DVCS, be it curl, git-bzr or bzr-git*****.
I must say that the backend should not matter here, only that you can make patches and run the code without using tools you do not want to use.
I like bzr b/c its integration into Nautilus and hate git b/c of its way of naming revisions and file handling. That is why I want to get your git with my bzr pull.
* http://geekswithblogs.net/ciscbrain/articles/Mono_vs_dotNet_Performance_Test.aspx
** http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
*** http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/performance-comparison-c-java-python-ruby-jython-jruby-groovy/
**** http://dev.xonotic.org/projects/xonotic/wiki/Repository_Access (the ./all script uses git to pull the sub directories and has to use git to even compile)
***** http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/foreign/bzr-on-git-projects.html and https://github.com/pieter/git-bzr
2010-12-18
Time problem.
"We are biological machines" -- someone
Reincarnation:
The problem I have with the idea of reincarnation is the time scale that this universe has, it is fakking old, it is between 13 and 14 billion years old.
When in this time did the sole come in to existence?
In the initial expanion of time/space, in the moments there after when matter won over anti matter, when the galaxies formed, when the Tellus accreted out of the proto solar system we live in, when the first proto cells started to consume energy, when the first beings that fall under the family of Homo started to walk the earth, when Homo Sapiens left Africa? when?
Humans has only existed for a trillionth of the time this universe has.(the first life forms started to emerge about 1 billion years ago, and we, Homo Sapiens, have only existed for not even one ppm of the time life has.)
An other thing that many people do not take in to consideration is that all life on this planet is connected, does that mean that plants has souls too? it would be illogical that plants and fungi and bacteria did not have soles too. this is real a problem I have with vegan/vegetarian moralists, they say it is immoral to take lives, but they are doing it them selves, when eating plants.
The third problem i have is that some people, I know one myself says that personality traits and consciousness are derived from the sole...... yeah, this is something I though myself when i was young and ignorant, but now i see us for what we are, machines, I, you and all the living things all around us are biological machines. Let me prove it for you:
How come people who has had strokes some times have personality changes? and why do we need a brain at all if the sole is what is doing all the calculations that makes up our consciousness? It is just not logical.
What about people who has sufferd from mental brakdows and have no memory of there past self, and has a new set of personality traits? did he lose his sole and got a now one?
Thing about it, and you will start to see the world as I do.
Reincarnation:
The problem I have with the idea of reincarnation is the time scale that this universe has, it is fakking old, it is between 13 and 14 billion years old.
When in this time did the sole come in to existence?
In the initial expanion of time/space, in the moments there after when matter won over anti matter, when the galaxies formed, when the Tellus accreted out of the proto solar system we live in, when the first proto cells started to consume energy, when the first beings that fall under the family of Homo started to walk the earth, when Homo Sapiens left Africa? when?
Humans has only existed for a trillionth of the time this universe has.(the first life forms started to emerge about 1 billion years ago, and we, Homo Sapiens, have only existed for not even one ppm of the time life has.)
An other thing that many people do not take in to consideration is that all life on this planet is connected, does that mean that plants has souls too? it would be illogical that plants and fungi and bacteria did not have soles too. this is real a problem I have with vegan/vegetarian moralists, they say it is immoral to take lives, but they are doing it them selves, when eating plants.
The third problem i have is that some people, I know one myself says that personality traits and consciousness are derived from the sole...... yeah, this is something I though myself when i was young and ignorant, but now i see us for what we are, machines, I, you and all the living things all around us are biological machines. Let me prove it for you:
How come people who has had strokes some times have personality changes? and why do we need a brain at all if the sole is what is doing all the calculations that makes up our consciousness? It is just not logical.
What about people who has sufferd from mental brakdows and have no memory of there past self, and has a new set of personality traits? did he lose his sole and got a now one?
Thing about it, and you will start to see the world as I do.
2010-12-15
Terror in the homeland.
Let me just say that when i heard about the suicide bomber in the capital reacted with " a what it the what now?" and when I heard that the bomber did not kill anyone i think i said "What an Epic Phail".
now, almost a week later....
I was listening to the radio on the way home and i was listening to P1:s "medierna" ( the media) (i think the show is called) and they were talking to some one from SÄPO (security police) about there now report that just come out about "violence seeking Muslims", the report stated that it was not the ideology that drew people violent but rather that violent people were drawn to violent organisations that may or may not be Islamic in nature. they mode an example where one of the subject in the report was a neo-Nazi before joining one of these organisations.
so where would I as a liberal, left-ish, darwanistic, atheistic, anti-religious, anti-deterministic human see my selfe in this?
I could see my self in many of the examples of what would trigger a person to become a terrorist or some one who would be seeking myself to organisations like these.
and that bothers me... Am I only labelling myself something become I want to be port of something? Am I that seared by the genes in me that i seek belonging? perhaps....
I have some times wanted to start a bloody revolution against religion, but not any longer, I rather have the position that If the religions mob wants blood they will get it, there own*. this may be a irrational wives, I can see it, but it is what I sometimes feel.
When i was young I was violent, but i have now, for the most part, been able to control my violence, and i now sometimes let my frustration out via phaild jokes or surfing the intrawebz. thinking and reading has also been a good thing to make me better at controlling my feelings.
I neither want violence or condone it, but I can see that it is sometimes necessary, but only in extreme cases, where all of the negotiating skills will not do to make people get along.
Reworking of surveillance laws
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
A member et the Social democratic party here in Sweden has said that the social democrats should tear up the now standing FRA-Lagen** and give the right to SÄPO to monitor, and bug people with out any suspicion of crime. and i think that this is just a non issue; just give them the right to monitor the web with trawling scripts, this would be more efficient then actual monitoring of all traffic that is out there. what i mean is that a fakking 15 yo scriptkiddie can make a (few) trawling script that could monitor the internet better then any "real" monitoring could.
That is it from me, and watch out for the LOICs.
* "I will fight for this secular state, the values that comes with a secular worldwide and the understanding that we got from science.... I would stand on the barricades, if need be, with a rifle in my hands, fighting for humanity against religion." -- one of the thought that I once had and that has stuck in my mind.
** FRA-Lagen, a surveillance law that treats what rights the military surveillance agency (FRA) has to monitor cable (internet, phone and sms) traffic. giving them right to have surveillance of incoming and transit but not internal traffic.
now, almost a week later....
I was listening to the radio on the way home and i was listening to P1:s "medierna" ( the media) (i think the show is called) and they were talking to some one from SÄPO (security police) about there now report that just come out about "violence seeking Muslims", the report stated that it was not the ideology that drew people violent but rather that violent people were drawn to violent organisations that may or may not be Islamic in nature. they mode an example where one of the subject in the report was a neo-Nazi before joining one of these organisations.
so where would I as a liberal, left-ish, darwanistic, atheistic, anti-religious, anti-deterministic human see my selfe in this?
I could see my self in many of the examples of what would trigger a person to become a terrorist or some one who would be seeking myself to organisations like these.
and that bothers me... Am I only labelling myself something become I want to be port of something? Am I that seared by the genes in me that i seek belonging? perhaps....
I have some times wanted to start a bloody revolution against religion, but not any longer, I rather have the position that If the religions mob wants blood they will get it, there own*. this may be a irrational wives, I can see it, but it is what I sometimes feel.
When i was young I was violent, but i have now, for the most part, been able to control my violence, and i now sometimes let my frustration out via phaild jokes or surfing the intrawebz. thinking and reading has also been a good thing to make me better at controlling my feelings.
I neither want violence or condone it, but I can see that it is sometimes necessary, but only in extreme cases, where all of the negotiating skills will not do to make people get along.
Reworking of surveillance laws
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
A member et the Social democratic party here in Sweden has said that the social democrats should tear up the now standing FRA-Lagen** and give the right to SÄPO to monitor, and bug people with out any suspicion of crime. and i think that this is just a non issue; just give them the right to monitor the web with trawling scripts, this would be more efficient then actual monitoring of all traffic that is out there. what i mean is that a fakking 15 yo scriptkiddie can make a (few) trawling script that could monitor the internet better then any "real" monitoring could.
That is it from me, and watch out for the LOICs.
* "I will fight for this secular state, the values that comes with a secular worldwide and the understanding that we got from science.... I would stand on the barricades, if need be, with a rifle in my hands, fighting for humanity against religion." -- one of the thought that I once had and that has stuck in my mind.
** FRA-Lagen, a surveillance law that treats what rights the military surveillance agency (FRA) has to monitor cable (internet, phone and sms) traffic. giving them right to have surveillance of incoming and transit but not internal traffic.
2010-12-09
"Don' fukk with the internet..."
"Don't fuck with the internet, it will fuck you so hard that you will die from rectal bleeding"
-- anon
A Manifest for the Internet
In recent time the Usage of LOIC's, botnets and Script kiddy's nifty scripts has made the internet a hole of rabid fuck tards.
I think that what you sow you reap, so the attacks on PayPal, MasterCard, and Visa is what is to be expected of the citizens of the internet. Me may not have built the net, but we inhabit it, and as such we have a right to do what we can to show our discontent with corps and law makers trying to close it down, people are just doing what they can to support a cause.
if this continues then i am afraid that the masses can no longer just stand by and do nothing, it is our future as a people at stake, we the citizens of the internets will develop now weapons to fight you, you who hate what the internet stands for, you ... you...
but I digress.
we the citizens of the internet has gathered around the banners of The Anonymous and the idea of free speech, where WikiLeaks is one of the pillars that holds the banners of free speech highest.
this is a war that those who want to close down the internet can not and must not win, if that happens then all hell will brake loose and people will fire ion cannons at each other, harpoons will smash server infrastructure to hell and back.
the internet is the one force you can not take on, law makers, it will not sit idly by and watch as all that we have built being destroyed.
back to wikileaks: the attack on Swedish Prosecution Agancy (ÅklagarMyndigheten) was not IMHO a grate idea. it only makes the opponent stranger. We are talking rape allegations here, it is nothing to take lightly, and found to be true we can not tAake the highground and use LOICs against law makers. but we need some one that can pick up the banner from the aches and start anew.
so remember: do not fuck with the internet, it will fuck you 5 times harder.
-- anon
A Manifest for the Internet
In recent time the Usage of LOIC's, botnets and Script kiddy's nifty scripts has made the internet a hole of rabid fuck tards.
I think that what you sow you reap, so the attacks on PayPal, MasterCard, and Visa is what is to be expected of the citizens of the internet. Me may not have built the net, but we inhabit it, and as such we have a right to do what we can to show our discontent with corps and law makers trying to close it down, people are just doing what they can to support a cause.
if this continues then i am afraid that the masses can no longer just stand by and do nothing, it is our future as a people at stake, we the citizens of the internets will develop now weapons to fight you, you who hate what the internet stands for, you ... you...
but I digress.
we the citizens of the internet has gathered around the banners of The Anonymous and the idea of free speech, where WikiLeaks is one of the pillars that holds the banners of free speech highest.
this is a war that those who want to close down the internet can not and must not win, if that happens then all hell will brake loose and people will fire ion cannons at each other, harpoons will smash server infrastructure to hell and back.
the internet is the one force you can not take on, law makers, it will not sit idly by and watch as all that we have built being destroyed.
back to wikileaks: the attack on Swedish Prosecution Agancy (ÅklagarMyndigheten) was not IMHO a grate idea. it only makes the opponent stranger. We are talking rape allegations here, it is nothing to take lightly, and found to be true we can not tAake the highground and use LOICs against law makers. but we need some one that can pick up the banner from the aches and start anew.
so remember: do not fuck with the internet, it will fuck you 5 times harder.
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)